4.5 Article

The interaction of modified histones with the bromodomain testis-specific (BRDT) gene and its mRNA level in sperm of fertile donors and subfertile men

Journal

REPRODUCTION
Volume 140, Issue 3, Pages 435-443

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/REP-10-0139

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Bayer Vital GmbH
  2. German Society of Andrology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As histone modifications have been suggested to be involved in the regulation of gene expression after fertilisation, the present study aimed to analyze the interaction between the bromodomain testis-specific ( BRDT) gene and differentially modified histones in human spermatozoa. The BRDT transcript level was studied to identify possible correlations between epigenetic changes, mRNA level and subfertility associated with impaired sperm chromatin condensation. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed with ejaculates from fertile and subfertile men using antibodies against specifically acetylated and methylated histone H3. Immunoprecipitated DNA was analysed by real-time quantitative PCR with primer pairs for BRDT. The BRDT mRNA level was screened by real-time RT-PCR. ChIP assay revealed co-localisation of acetylated and methylated histones within promoter and exon regions of the BRDT gene in fertile men. Interestingly, reduced binding of investigated modified histone modifications was observed in the BRDT promoter of subfertile patients. Different mRNA levels of BRDT have been detected in a group of infertile patients, as well as in fertile men. Enrichment of methylated histones within the BRDT promoter of fertile sperm suggests that this epigenetic mark may cause repression of BRDT after fertilisation, and may be changed in infertile patients. Our data suggest that reduced histone methylation in the promoter of BRDT may be associated with increased transcript levels in subfertile patients. Reproduction (2010) 140 435-443

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available