4.7 Review

Non-equilibrium statistical mechanics: from a paradigmatic model to biological transport

Journal

REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS
Volume 74, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/74/11/116601

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  2. Army Research office [58386MA]
  3. US National Science Foundation [DMR-0705152, DMR-1005417, DMS-1032131, ARO-58386MA, DMS-1021818]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unlike equilibrium statistical mechanics, with its well-established foundations, a similar widely accepted framework for non-equilibrium statistical mechanics (NESM) remains elusive. Here, we review some of the many recent activities on NESM, focusing on some of the fundamental issues and general aspects. Using the language of stochastic Markov processes, we emphasize general properties of the evolution of configurational probabilities, as described by master equations. Of particular interest are systems in which the dynamics violates detailed balance, since such systems serve to model a wide variety of phenomena in nature. We next review two distinct approaches for investigating such problems. One approach focuses on models sufficiently simple to allow us to find exact, analytic, non-trivial results. We provide detailed mathematical analyses of a one-dimensional continuous-time lattice gas, the totally asymmetric exclusion process. It is regarded as a paradigmatic model for NESM, much like the role the Ising model played for equilibrium statistical mechanics. It is also the starting point for the second approach, which attempts to include more realistic ingredients in order to be more applicable to systems in nature. Restricting ourselves to the area of biophysics and cellular biology, we review a number of models that are relevant for transport phenomena. Successes and limitations of these simple models are also highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available