4.7 Article

Perceptions of bioenergy among Nepalese foresters - Survey results and policy implications

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 533-538

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.02.017

Keywords

Bioenergy; Policy; Perceptions; Nepalese foresters

Funding

  1. Lyy-Institute at the University of Eastern Finland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Modern bioenergy technologies have been recognized as one of the potential energy sources in Nepal to address the current energy crisis and contribute to the rural development. Nepalese foresters play an important role in the natural resource management sector of Nepal. Their perceptions can be important considering their experiences in the forestry sector and awareness of the local situations especially in the remote and rural areas of Nepal. Therefore, the study through a questionnaire-based survey aimed to explore their perceptions of bioenergy development in Nepal including the policy issues. Total 65 Nepalese foresters were interviewed for the study working for various forestry related government organizations located in Kathmandu, Nepal. The study found that the Nepalese foresters perceived positively the importance of bioenergy development in Nepal for employment and rural income generation, and improving the current energy situation by supplying locally produced and affordable energy sources. The respondents held community participation in the future bioenergy projects as a key to its successful implementation in Nepal. However, there is a strong need, as perceived by the respondents, to formulate a separate bioenergy policy for Nepal. Among various policy interventions formulation of a new bioenergy policy, mobilizing community participation in bioenergy projects, developing bioenergy markets, and implementing new bioenergy projects were considered as urgent for Nepal. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available