4.7 Article

Wind speed spatial estimation for energy planning in Sicily: Introduction and statistical analysis

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages 1237-1250

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2007.08.012

Keywords

neural networks; IDW; kriging; Weibull; Sicily; wind

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The exploitation of the renewable energy sources plays a key role for achieving the CO2 emissions reduction targets established by the Kyoto Protocol, as well as for facing the shortage of world fossil fuels reserves. In countries like Italy, with an high potential in terms of wind power generation, in efficient energy planning based oil renewables is a very complex task. It encompasses many aspects: the resource availability assessment, the compliance with environmental and legislative constraints and last, but not least, the technical aspects linked to the safe integration to the grid of the intermittent power generated by the wind farms. This paper is the first part of a study addressing the first of the aforementioned issues. The wind measurements recorded in several stations of Sicily (Italy) were used for the spatial modelling of the wind fields over the region. A statistical analysis of the wind data has allowed the estimation of the parameters of the wind probability distribution function, that is a Weibull, as predicted by theory. In the last sections of the paper the results of some traditional deterministic and geostatistical interpolation techniques are shown. In the companion paper the maps of the estimated wind fields have been obtained by using the results of the statistical investigation accomplished here and coupling neural and geostatistical techniques. For a comprehensive evaluation of the forecasting accuracy of this neural kriging approach, those maps have to be compared with the maps showed in this paper. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available