4.8 Review

Assessment of the global ocean wind energy resource

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 33, Issue -, Pages 382-391

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.065

Keywords

Global ocean; Wind energy resource; CCMP wind field data; Wind energy storage; Long-term trend; Grade classification map

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research Development Program Astronomy and Earth Factor on the Impact of Climate Change [2012CB957803]
  2. Special Fund for Public Welfare Industry (Meteorology) [GYHY201306026]
  3. program titled Asian Regional Sea-Air Interaction Mechanism and its Role in Global Change [2010CB950400]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Against a background of an environmental and resources crisis, the exploitation of renewable and clean energy can effectively alleviate the energy crisis and contribute to emission reduction and environmental protection, thus promoting sustainable development. This study aims to develop a grade classification map of the global ocean wind energy resource based on CCMP (cross-calibrated, multi-platform) wind field data for the period 1988-2011. We also calculate, for the first time, the total storage and effective storage of wind energy across the global ocean on a 0.25 degrees x 0.25 degrees grid. An optimistic increasing long-term trend in wind power density was found. In addition, the global ocean wind energy resource was analyzed and regionalized by considering the temporal and spatial distributions of wind power density, wind energy levels, and effective wind speed, as well as through a consideration of wind energy storage and the stability and long-term trends of wind power density. This research fills a gap in our knowledge in this field, and provides a reference point for future scientific research and development into wind energy resources such as wind power generation, water pumping, and wind-heating. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available