4.7 Article

Percutaneous CT-guided irreversible electroporation followed by chemotherapy as a novel neoadjuvant protocol in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Our preliminary experience

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages S34-S39

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.06.049

Keywords

IRE; Irreversible electroporation; Pancreatic cancer; Gemcitabine; Oxaliplatin; Downstaging

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a non-thermal ablation technique recently used in pancreatic cancer. In our prospective study we evaluated safety, feasibility and efficacy of a neoadjuvant protocol based on CT-guided percutaneous IRE followed by chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods: We performed CT-guided percutaneous IRE in 20 patients with LAPC, followed by a combination of gemcitabine (1000 mg/mq) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/mq) biweekly. Imaging follow-up was performed by a contrast enhanced CT scan at 1, 3, 6 months and then every 3 months. Results: No major complications occurred. Two patients died 3 and 4 months after IRE because of rapidly progressive disease. In the remaining 18 patients 6-month imaging follow-up showed a mean lesions volumetric decrease percentage of 42.89% (95% Confidence Interval: 34.90e54.88%). Thanks to lesions downstaging, three patients underwent R0 resection. At last available follow-up (mean follow-up 91 months; range 6-14), imaging showed no disease progression or post-surgical relapse in all 18 cases. The mean estimated survival was 12,950 months (95% CI: 11,570-14,332). Conclusions: Our preliminary study suggests that IRE followed by chemotherapy is safe, feasible and effective in producing local control of LAPC, with a possible downstaging effect to resectable lesions. (C) 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available