4.5 Article

Peripheral Arterial Disease Predicts Overall and Cardiovascular Mortality in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Journal

RENAL FAILURE
Volume 34, Issue 8, Pages 1010-1014

Publisher

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/0886022X.2012.696470

Keywords

PAD; survival; atherosclerosis; cardiovascular disease; ESRD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is an important manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis and is common among dialysis patients. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for the leading cause of mortality in dialysis patients, and PAD has been found as a predictor for cardiovascular as well as overall mortality in general population. However, the study on the role of PAD in the prognosis of peritoneal dialysis patients is rather limited. Methods: Prevalent continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients over 60 years old were recruited in this study and were followed-up regularly to death or the end of the study. The diagnosis of PAD was based on ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI) < 0.9 or intermittent claudication. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify the risk factors for cardiovascular and overall mortality. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method followed by log-rank test to compare the mortality rate between PAD and non-PAD patients. Results: One hundred and seventy-one patients were included and 62 (36%) had PAD complication. In the follow-up of 24.4 (median 34.6) months, 36 deaths were recorded: 19 from PAD group and 17 from non-PAD group. Twenty-one patients died due to CVD: 13 from PAD group and 8 from non-PAD group. The presence of PAD and serum albumin was found independently associated with cardiovascular and overall mortality using Cox proportional hazards model. Conclusion: PAD is very common in aged peritoneal dialysis patients and independently associated with both cardiovascular and overall mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available