4.7 Article

Mapping maximum urban air temperature on hot summer days

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 154, Issue -, Pages 38-45

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.08.012

Keywords

Landsat; Air temperature; Urban; Spatial modeling; Remote sensing application; Random forest; Statistical model; Urban heat island

Funding

  1. Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions
  2. Simon Fraser University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Air temperature is an essential component in microclimate and environmental health research, but difficult to map in urban environments because of strong temperature gradients. We introduce a spatial regression approach to map the peak daytime air temperature relative to a reference station on typical hot summer days using Vancouver, Canada as a case study. Three regression models, ordinary least squares regression, support vector machine, and random forest, were all calibrated using Landsat TM/ETM + data and field observations from two sources: Environment Canada and the Weather Underground. Results based on cross-validation indicate that the random forest model produced the lowest prediction errors (RMSE = 2.31 degrees C). Some weather stations were consistently cooler/hotter than the reference station and were predicted well, while other stations, particularly those close to the ocean, showed greater temperature variability and were predicted with greater errors. A few stations, most of which were from the Weather Underground data set, were very poorly predicted and possibly unrepresentative of air temperature in the area. The random forest model generally produced a sensible map of temperature distribution in the area The spatial regression approach appears useful for mapping intraurban air temperature variability and can easily be applied to other cities. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available