4.7 Article

Inter-comparison of microwave satellite soil moisture retrievals over the Murrumbidgee Basin, southeast Australia

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.016

Keywords

Soil moisture; Remote sensing; AMSR-E; SMOS; ASCAT; Validation

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC Linkage Project) [LP110200520]
  2. Australian Research Council [LP110200520] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of satellite-based soil moisture retrievals for hydrologic, meteorological and climatological applications is advancing significantly due to increasing capability and temporal coverage of current and future missions. Characterisation of the relative skill of soil moisture products from different satellite sensors on a common spatial grid is crucial to achieve synergetic applications. This paper therefore evaluates three soil moisture products from AMSR-E (Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer - Earth Observing System), ASCAT (Advanced Scatterometer) and SMOS (Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity) in absolute soil moisture units and on a common grid, against in-situ observations from southeast Australia. Before renormalisation, the three products yield correlations of 0.63-0.71 and a similar root-mean-square difference (RMSD) in the order of 0.1 m(3) m(-3), although showing different levels of error contributions from bias, variance and correlations. The results are compared with land and precipitation data to investigate the sensitivity of their errors to land surface features. Three renormalisation strategies - minimum-maximum matching, mean/standard-deviation (mu-sigma) matching and cumulative distribution function (CDF) matching - are considered for correcting systematic differences between ground and satellite data. The renormalised satellite data is found to retain RMSDs of 0.04-0.06 m(3) m(-3) on average. The CDF method produces only marginal further improvements to correlations (0.67-0.75) and RMSDs compared to the mu-sigma approach. The renormalisations by mu-sigma and CDF methods also bring three products into better agreements with each other, but lead to strong correlations between RMSD and the dynamic range of in-situ soil moisture. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available