4.7 Article

Evaluation of optical remote sensing to estimate actual evapotranspiration and canopy conductance

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 250-261

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2012.11.004

Keywords

Surface conductance; Penman Monteith; MODIS; ET; EF; Vegetation indices; LAI; fPAR

Funding

  1. AmeriFlux (U.S. Department of Energy, Biological and Environmental Research, Terrestrial Carbon Program) [DE-FG02-04ER63917, DE-FG02-04ER63911]
  2. CarboEuropelP
  3. FAO-GTOS-TCO
  4. iLEAPS
  5. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  6. National Science Foundation
  7. University of Tuscia
  8. Universite Laval and Environment Canada
  9. US Department of Energy
  10. CSIRO OCE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compared estimates of actual evapotranspiration (ET) produced with six different vegetation measures derived from the MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and three contrasting estimation approaches using measurements from eddy covariance flux towers at 16 FLUXNET sites located over six different land cover types. The aim was to assess optimal approaches in using optical remote sensing to estimate ET. The first two approaches directly regressed various MODIS vegetation indices (VIs) and products such as leaf area index (LAI) and fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR) with ET and evaporative fraction (EF). In the third approach, the Penman-Monteith (PM) equation was inverted to obtain surface conductance (G(s)), for dry plant canopies. The G(s) values were then regressed against the MODIS data products and used to parameterize the PM equation for retrievals of ET. Jack-Knife cross-validation was used to evaluate the various regression models against observed ET. The PM-G(s) approach provided the lowest root mean square error (RMSE), and highest determination coefficients (R-2) across all sites, with an average RMSE = 38 W m(-2) and R-2=0.72. Direct regressions of observed ET against the VIs resulted in an average RMSE = 60 W m(-2) and R-2=0.22, while the EF regressions an average RMSE = 42 W m(-2) and R-2=0.64. The MODIS LAI and fPAR product produced the poorest estimates of ET (RMSE> 44 W m(-2) and R-2<0.6); while the VIs each performed best for some of the land cover types. The enhanced vegetation index (EVI) produced the best Er estimates for evergreen needleleaf forest (RMSE = 28.4W m(-2), R-2=0.66). The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) best estimated ET in grassland (RMSE = 23.8 W m(-2) and R-2=0.68), cropland (RMSE = 29.2 W m(-2) and R-2=0.86) and woody savannas (RMSE = 25.4 W m(-2) and R-2=0.82), while the VI-based crop coefficient (K-c) yielded the best estimates for evergreen and deciduous broadleaf forests (RMSE = 27 W m(-2) and R-2=0.7 in both cases). Using the ensemble-average of ET as estimated using NDVI, EVI and K-c we computed global grids of dry canopy conductance (G(c)) from which annual statistics were extracted to characterise different functional types. The resulting G(c) values can be used to parameterize land surface models. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available