4.7 Article

Normalized difference chlorophyll index: A novel model for remote estimation of chlorophyll-a concentration in turbid productive waters

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages 394-406

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.016

Keywords

Chlorophyll-a; Normalized difference chlorophyll index; Remote sensing reflectance; Spectral algorithm; Turbid productive waters; MEdium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer

Funding

  1. European Space Agency [C1P. 6866]
  2. Mississippi State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a normalized difference chlorophyll index (NDCI) to predict chlorophyll-a (chl-a) concentration from remote sensing data in estuarine and coastal turbid productive (case 2) waters. NDCI calibration and validation results derived from simulated and MEdium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS) datasets show its potential application to widely varying water types and geographic regions. A quadratic function (R-2=0.95, p<0.0001) accurately explained the variance in the simulated data for a chl-a range of 1-60 mg m(-3). Similarly a twofold calibration and validation of chl-a models using MERIS dataset, (chl-a range: 0.9-28.1 mg m(-3)) yielded R-2 of 0.9, and RMSE of similar to 2 mg m(-3) respectively. NDCI was applied on images over the Chesapeake Bay and Delaware Bay, the Mobile Bay, and the Mississippi River delta region in the northern Gulf of Mexico. The newly developed algorithm was successful in predicting chl-a concentration with approximately 12% overall bias for all above study regions. Findings from this research imply that NDCI can be successfully used on MERIS images to quantitatively monitor chl-a in inland coastal and estuarine waters. In case of remote coastal waters with no ground truth data. NDCI can be used to detect algal bloom and qualitatively infer chl-a concentration ranges very similar to NDVI's application in terrestrial vegetation studies. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available