Journal
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages 1263-1276Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.016
Keywords
LiDAR; Non-parametric estimation; Nearest neighbor; k-Most Similar Neighbor; Random Forest
Funding
- Finnish Forest Research Institute
- Metsahallitus
- Metsamannut
- Metsateho
- Stora Enso
- UPM-Kymmene
- universities of Helsinki and Joensuu
- Academy of Finland [12193]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Forest inventories based on single-tree interpretation of airborne laser scanning (ALS) data often rely on an allometric estimation chain in which inaccuracies in the estimates of the diameter at breast height (DBH) propagate to other characteristics of interest such as the stem volume. Our purpose was to test nearest neighbor imputation by the k-Most Similar Neighbor (k-MSN) and the Random Forest (RF) methods for the simultaneous estimation of species, DBH, height and stem volume using ALS data. The predictors included computational alpha shape metrics and variables based on the height and intensity distributions in the ALS data. Separate data sets covering 1898 and 1249 dominant to intermediate trees in a typical Scandinavian stand structure were used for training and validation, respectively. RF proved to be a flexible method with an ability to handle 1846 predictors with no need for their reduction. Classification of Scots pine, Norway spruce and deciduous trees showed an accuracy of 78%, and the estimates of DBH, height and volume had root mean square errors of 13%, 3%, and 31%, respectively, when evaluated against the validation data. The two selection strategies implemented here reduced the number of candidate variables effectively without any substantial effect on the accuracy relative to the use of all predictors. Differences in k-MSN and RF imputations were marginal when the reduced sets of variables were used. Estimation accuracies could be maintained practically unchanged with only 12.5% of the initial reference data (237 trees), provided the distribution of the observations was similar in the reference and target data. Since we used information collected in the field for extracting the ALS point clouds for individual trees, our results represent an optimal case and should nevertheless be validated against automated tree delineation. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available