4.7 Article

Modelling daytime thermal infrared directional anisotropy over Toulouse city centre

Journal

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages 87-105

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.012

Keywords

Urban canopy; Surface temperature; Directional anisotropy; Thermal infrared; Urban energy balance model; Radiative transfer; SOLENE

Funding

  1. Meteo France

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurements of thermal infrared (TIR) directional anisotropy (difference between off-nadir and nadir brightness temperatures) performed over the city of Toulouse using a method based on the use of 2 airbome TIR cameras are presented. Results from 3 flights at different times during a summer day (July 15th 2004) and from I flight in winter (February 25th 2005) all confirm important anisotropy (up to 10 degrees C) and hot spot effects as previously reported in literature. A simple simulation approach is then proposed. It is based on the aggregation in any viewing direction of 6 directional temperatures (sunlit/shaded walls/streets/roofs) weighted by their corresponding surface ratios within the scene viewed. The city is described by 18 canyon streets oriented in all directions by 10 degrees steps and the 6 temperatures are determined by integrating simulations of the energy balance model SOLENE repeated for the 18 canyon streets. The surface ratios are computed from images of the studied area generated with the POV-Ray software (Persistence of Vison Raytracer, http://www.povray.org/). This method is described in detail. The modelled anisotropy compares favourably with the measurements on all dates, despite a systematic underestimation ranging between 15 and 30%. The possible sources of discrepancy including sensitivity to the aspect ratio and to the surface parameters and possible impact of microscale structures are briefly discussed and several improvements of the modelling system are suggested. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available