4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Static and dynamic metrics of economic resilience for interdependent infrastructure and industry sectors

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 92-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.09.007

Keywords

Resilience; Interdependent infrastructures; Inoperability

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I01344X/1, EP/I01344X/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. EPSRC [EP/I01344X/1, EP/I01344X/2] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infrastructures are needed for maintaining functionality and stability of society, while being put under substantial stresses from natural or man-made shocks. Since avoiding shock is impossible, increased focus is given to infrastructure resilience, which denotes the ability to recover and operate under new stable regimes. This paper addresses the problem of estimating, quantifying and planning for economic resilience of interdependent infrastructures, where interconnectedness adds to problem complexity. The risk-based economic input-output model enterprise, a useful tool for measuring the cascading effects of interdependent failures, is employed to introduce a framework for economic resilience estimation. We propose static and dynamic measures for resilience that confirm to well-known resilience concepts of robustness, rapidity, redundancy, and resourcefulness. The quantitative metrics proposed here (static resilience metric, time averaged level of operability, maximum loss of functionality, time to recovery) guide a preparedness decision making framework to promote interdependent economic resilience estimation. Using the metrics we introduce new multi-dimensional resilience functions that allow multiple resource allocation scenarios. Through an example problem we demonstrate the usefulness of these functions in guiding resource planning for building resilience. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available