4.7 Article

A computational model for evaluating the effects of attention, memory, and mental models on situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators

Journal

RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages 1796-1805

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2009.05.012

Keywords

Computational model; Situation assessment; Bayesian network; Nuclear power plant operators; Human reliability analysis; Cognitive factor

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵06A1605, 2008-2006676, 2007-0054859] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Operators in nuclear power plants have to acquire information from human system interfaces (HSIs) and the environment in order to create, update, and confirm their understanding of a plant state, as failures of situation assessment may cause wrong decisions for process control and finally errors of commission in nuclear power plants. A few computational models that can be used to predict and quantify the situation awareness of operators have been suggested. However, these models do not sufficiently consider human characteristics for nuclear power plant operators. In this paper, we propose a computational model for situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators using a Bayesian network. This model incorporates human factors significantly affecting operators' situation assessment, such as attention, working memory decay, and mental model. As this proposed model provides quantitative results of situation assessment and diagnostic performance, we expect that this model can be used in the design and evaluation of human system interfaces as well as the prediction of situation awareness errors in the human reliability analysis. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available