4.4 Article

Oral bioaccessibility testing and read-across hazard assessment of nickel compounds

Journal

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages 20-28

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.02.005

Keywords

Nickel; Metal; Acute toxicity; Oral; REACH; Read-across; Rat; Classification; Bioavailability; Bioaccessibility

Funding

  1. Nickel REACH Consortia
  2. Nickel Producers Environmental Research Association, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In vitro metal ion bioaccessibility, as a measure of bioavailability, can be used to read-across toxicity information from data-rich, source substances to data-poor, target substances. To meet the data requirements for oral systemic toxicity endpoints under the REACH Regulation in Europe, 12 nickel substances underwent bioaccessibility testing in stomach and intestinal fluids. A read-across paradigm was developed based on the correlation between gastric bioaccessibility and in vivo acute oral toxicity. The oral LD50 values were well predicted by nickel release (R-2 = 0.91). Samples releasing <48% available nickel (mg Ni released/mg available Ni x 100) are predicted to have an LD50 > 2000 mg/kg; while samples releasing >76% available nickel are expected to have an LD50 between 300 and 2000 mg/kg. The hazard classifications (European Regulation on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Chemical Substances and Mixtures) for all oral systemic endpoints were evaluated based on read-across from three source nickel compounds (sulfate, subsulfide, oxide). Samples releasing <48% available nickel were read-across from nickel oxides and subsulfide. Samples releasing >76% Ni were read-across from nickel sulfate. This assessment suggests that nickel chloride and dihydroxide should be less stringently classified and nickel sulfamate should receive a more stringent classification for oral systemic endpoints than currently assigned. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available