4.4 Article

Safety evaluation of a high lipid Whole Algalin Flour (WAF) from Chlorella protothecoides

Journal

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages 155-165

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.03.011

Keywords

Chlorella protothecoides; Allergenic; Clastogenic; Genotoxic; Human repeat-insult patch test; Mutagenic; Toxicity; Rat

Funding

  1. Solazyme Roquette Nutritionals LLC.
  2. South San Francisco, CA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microalgae such as Chlorella spp. have a long history of use in human food. A high lipid Whole Algalin Flour (WAF) composed of dried milled Chlorella protothecoides was evaluated for subchronic toxicity and genotoxic potential. Likelihood of food allergy potential was also evaluated by human repeat-insult patch test. In the subchronic study, rats were fed dietary levels of 25,000, 50,000 or 100,000 ppm WAF in feed for 93-94 days. No mortalities occurred. No treatment-related effects were identified for general condition, body weight, food consumption, ophthalmology, urinalysis, hematology, clinical chemistry, gross pathology, organ weights, and histopathology. Although statistically significant effects were noted for several endpoints, none was test-substance related. The no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) for WAF was based on consumption of the 100,000 ppm diet, the highest dietary concentration tested, and was 4807 mg/kg bw/d in male rats and 5366 mg/kg bw/d in female rats. Additionally, WAF (<= 5000 mu g/plate) was not mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium or Escherichia coli tester strains nor did WAF induce a clastogenic response in bone marrow from mice given a single oral dose (2000 mg/kg bw). Further. WAF did not elicit skin sensitization in a repeat-insult dermal patch test which indicates little potential for food allergy. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available