4.4 Article

Development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the carcinogenic potency of chemicals. II. Using oral slope factor as a measure of carcinogenic potency

Journal

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages 215-226

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.09.019

Keywords

Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS); Oral slope factor (OSF); Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models; Carcinogenic potency; Toxicity estimation; Quantitative structure-toxicity relationship (QSTR) models

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The overall risk associated with exposure to a chemical is determined by combining quantitative estimates of exposure to the chemical with their known health effects. For chemicals that cause carcinogenicity, oral slope factors (OSFs) and inhalation unit risks are used to quantitatively estimate the carcinogenic potency or the risk associated with exposure to the chemical by oral or inhalation route, respectively. Frequently, there is a lack of animal or human studies in the literature to determine OSFs. This study aims to circumvent this problem by developing quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict the OSFs of chemicals. The OSFs of 70 chemicals based on male/female human, rat, and mouse bioassay data were obtained from the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) database. A global QSAR model that considered all 70 chemicals as well as species and/or sex-specific QSARs were developed in this study. Study results indicate that the species and sex-specific QSARs (r(2) > 0.8, q(2) > 0.7) had a better predictive abilities than the global QSAR developed using data from all species and sexes (r(2) = 0.77, q(2) = 0.73). The QSARs developed in this study were externally validated, and demonstrated reasonable predictive abilities. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available