4.4 Article

Identification of structure-activity relationships for adverse effects of pharmaceuticals in humans: Part B. Use of (Q)SAR systems for early detection of drug-induced hepatobiliary and urinary tract toxicities

Journal

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 23-42

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.01.009

Keywords

AERS; Computational toxicology; Drug adverse effects; Drug-induced liver injury; Drug-induced renal toxicity; In silico; Post-market reporting; Quantitative structure-activity relationships; QSAR software; SAR; SRS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This report describes the development of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for predicting rare drug-induced liver and urinary tract injury in humans based upon a database of post-marketing adverse effects (AEs) linked to similar to 1600 chemical structures. The models are based upon estimated population exposure using AE proportional reporting ratios. Models were constructed for 5 types of liver injury (liver enzyme disorders, cytotoxic injury, cholestasis and jaundice, bile duct disorders, gall bladder disorders) and 6 types of urinary tract injury (acute renal disorders, nephropathies, bladder disorders, kidney function tests, blood in urine, urolithiases). Identical training data sets were configured for 4 QSAR programs (MC4PC, MDL-QSAR, BioEpisteme, and Predictive Data Miner). Model performance was optimized and was shown to be affected by the AE scoring method and the ratio of the number of active to inactive drugs. The best QSAR models exhibited an overall average 92.4% coverage, 86.5% specificity and 39.3% sensitivity. The 4 QSAR programs were demonstrated to be complementary and enhanced performance was obtained by combining predictions from 2 programs (average 78.4% specificity, 56.2% sensitivity). Consensus predictions resulted in better performance as judged by both internal and external validation experiments. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available