4.4 Article

Biomonitoring Equivalents (BE) dossier for acrylamide (AA) (CAS No. 79-06-1)

Journal

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 51, Issue 3, Pages S57-S67

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.05.010

Keywords

Biomonitoring equivalents; BEs; acrylamide; blood; urine; risk assessment; screening

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent efforts by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other researchers have resulted in a growing database of measured concentrations of chemical substances in blood or urine samples taken from the general population. However, few tools exist to assist in the interpretation of the measured values in a health risk context. Biomonitoring Equivalents (BEs) are defined as the concentration or range of concentrations of a chemical or its metabolite in a biological medium (blood, urine, or other medium) that is consistent with an existing health-based exposure guideline. This document reviews available pharmacokinetic data and models for acrylamide and applies these data and models to existing health based exposure guidance values from the US Environmental Protection Agency, the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Health Canada, and the World Health Organization, to estimate corresponding BE values for acrylamide in blood and urine. Specifically, BEs are calculated for AA hemoglobin valine terminal adducts [N-(2-carbamoylethyl)valine (AAVal)] and GA hemoglobin valine terminal adducts [N-(2-carbamoyl-2-hydroxyethyl)valine (GAVal)], and the AA glutathione conjugate N-acetyl-S(2-carbamoylethyl)cysteine (AAMA) in urine. These values can be used as screening tools for evaluation of biomonitoring data for acrylamide in the context of existing risk assessments for acrylamide and for prioritization of the potential need for additional risk assessment and risk management efforts for acrylamide. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available