4.4 Article

In vitro activity of dermaseptin S4 derivatives against genital infections pathogens

Journal

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 353-358

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.01.005

Keywords

antimicrobial peptides; dermaseptins; sexually transmitted diseases; Candida albicans

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ojectives: Sexually transmitted infections present a great risk to the reproductive health of women. Therefore, female-controlled vaginal products directed toward disease prevention are needed urgently. In the present study, efforts were made to evaluate the antimicrobial potency of dermaseptin DS4, an antimicrobial peptide derived from frog skin. To assess the structure-activity relationship between the native DS4 and their derivatives, a set of chemically modified peptides was synthesized and evaluated. Methods: Different strains of bacteria and fungi were used to detect the antimicrobial activity of the new compounds. HeLa cultures were used to determine the safety of compounds towards their toxicity. Results: All DS4 derivatives elicited concentration-dependent antimicrobial activity at micrograms concentrations (MIC values: 4 mu g/mL-l mg/mL). K4S4(1-28) and K4S4(1-16)a were the most active peptides whereas S4(6-28) was the less one. The order was K4S4(1-28) > K4S4(1-16)a > S4a > S4 > S4(6-28). In cytotoxicity assay, some compounds were found to be significantly safer than current antibiotics. Our data also show that increasing the number of positive charges of the peptide resulted in a reduced cytotoxicity without affecting the antimicrobial effect. Conclusions: This study indicates that dermaseptins are antimicrobial molecules that deserve to be tested as topical microbicide with useful associated activities that can add to their prophylaxis, safety and effectiveness. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available