4.7 Article

Microstructural evolution of a 304-type austenitic stainless steel during rolling at temperatures of 773-1273 K

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 82, Issue -, Pages 244-254

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.023

Keywords

Austenitic stainless steel; Multiple rolling; Grain refinement; Continuous dynamic recrystallization

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education and Science, Russia [14.575.21.0070]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The structural changes leading to grain refinement in a 304-type austenitic stainless steel subjected to warm caliber rolling over a wide temperature range of 773-1273 K were studied. The development of a new ultrafine-grained structure during rolling primarily resulted from continuous dynamic recrystallization. Two deformation domains were recognized that exhibit different recrystallization processes. In the high-temperature deformation domain, the majority of new strain-induced grain boundaries developed homogeneously through largely uniform formation of a network of deformation sub-boundaries, the misorientations of which attained values of high-angle grain boundaries during deformation. In this case, the kinetics of the microstructural evolution depended on dynamic recovery, which accelerated with increasing deformation temperature. In contrast, the development of new strain-induced grain boundaries was primarily associated with deformation microbanding in the low-temperature deformation domain. The development of deformation microbands resulted from strain localization and was promoted by a decrease in the deformation temperature. Therefore, the opposite temperature effect on the contribution of different structural mechanisms to new grain development led to temperature-independent kinetics of grain refinement for a wide range of warm working.(C) 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available