4.5 Article

Dealing with changing risks: a New Zealand perspective on climate change adaptation

Journal

REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 581-594

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-014-0673-1

Keywords

Climate change; Adaptation; Barriers; Community response; Local government; Indigenous people

Funding

  1. New Zealand Ministry for Science and Innovation (part of the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment) [VICX0805]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Future changes in New Zealand's climate are expected to be less than in many other countries, and New Zealand has well-established governance structures for dealing with environmental risks. While this might imply that adaptation would be straightforward, extensive public and private investments, as well as many traditional MAori assets and cultural values, are in areas increasingly at risk of flooding and sea level rise. In order to consider the country's adaptive capacity in more detail, we have used an empirical research approach, working with government practitioners at three levels and with MAori communities. Very different perceptions of risk, and structural inertia in planning processes have emerged as key issues for implementing adaptation responses. In particular, the use of static frameworks biases responses towards retrospective, rather than anticipatory analysis. Ongoing socioeconomic changes in New Zealand also raise the risk of structural effects caused by climate change impacts becoming unevenly distributed across society. Our analysis indicates that a national and regional strategic approach, centred on a dynamic view of climate risk, is necessary for effective decisions at the local government and community level. In addition, effective adaptation requires better identification of barriers and opportunities for addressing changing risk, together with more effective and continuous social engagement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available