4.5 Article

National and regional determinants of tropical deforestation in Colombia

Journal

REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages 1181-1193

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10113-013-0433-7

Keywords

Tropical forest; Deforestation; Drivers; Heterogeneity; Regional; Colombia

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  2. Universidad Nacional de Colombia
  3. CONVOCATORIA NACIONAL PARA EL FORTALECIMIENTO DE ALIANZAS ESTRATEGICAS INTERINSTITUCIONALES. UN [12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Global tropical deforestation continues to occur at high rates despite political attention. National-level forest baselines are being established all over the world to guide the implementation of several policy mechanisms. However, identifying the direct and indirect drivers of deforestation and understanding the complexity of their interlinkages are often difficult. We first analyzed deforestation between 1990 and 2005 at the national level and found an annual deforestation rate of 0.62 %. Next, we performed separate analyses for four natural regions in Colombia and found annual deforestation rates between 0.42 and 1.92 %. Using general linear models, we identified several direct causes and underlying factors influencing deforestation at the national level: rural population density, cattle, protected areas, and slope. Significant differences in deforestation rates and causes were found across regions. In the Caribbean region, drivers of loss are urban population, unsatisfied basic needs, slope, and precipitation and four land use variables (illicit crops, pastures, cattle, and fires). In the Orinoco region, crops are the main driver of forest loss, and in the Amazonian region, deforestation is primarily due to fires related to the colonization front. Policy mechanisms will have to take into account regional patterns to successfully balance development and forest preservation in Colombia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available