4.7 Article

Cadmium ion-selective sorbent preconcentration method using ion imprinted poly(ethylene glycol dimethacrylate-co-vinylimidazole)

Journal

REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages 325-333

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2010.02.006

Keywords

Cadmium; Ion imprinted polymer; Sorbent preconcentration

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  4. Institut Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Bioanalitica of Bianalytical (INCT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study focuses on the preparation of an Cd2+-imprinted poly(ethylene glycol dimethacrylate-co-vinylimidazole) for selective extraction/preconcentration of Cd2+ ions from aqueous solution, with further determination by FAAS using a flow system Sorbent extraction/preconcentration system was optimized by using chemometric tools (factorial design and Doehlert matrix). Under optimized conditions, the method presented a limit of detection of 0.11 mu g L-1 and linear analytical curve from 1.0 up to 50 0 mu g L-1 (r = 0.993). The preconcentration factor (PF), consumptive index (CI) and concentration efficiency (CE) were found to be 38.4, 0.39 mL and 14 3 min(-1), respectively. The selectivity coefficient of ion imprinted polymer was compared with the selectivity coefficient of NIP (non-imprinted polymer) for the Cd2+/Pb2+, Cd2+/Cu2+ and Cd2+/Zn2+ binary mixtures, where the respective values of relative selectivity coefficient (k') of 1575, 4.44 and 1.38 were obtained. The proposed method was successfully applied for cadmium determination in different types of water samples, urine and certified reference material (Lobster Hepatopancreas). Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available