4.5 Article

Options for additive rapid prototyping methods (3D printing) in MEMS technology

Journal

RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 403-412

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/RPJ-04-2013-0038

Keywords

Additive manufacturing; MEMS; Battery; Lab-on-a-chip; Microfluidic; Microfabrication

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - This study aims to investigate the options for additive rapid prototyping methods in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology. Additive rapid prototyping technologies, such as stereolithography (SLA), fused deposition modeling (FDM) and selective laser sintering (SLS), all commonly known as three-dimensional (3D) printing methods, are reviewed and compared with the resolution requirements of the traditional MEMS fabrication methods. Design/methodology/approach - In the 3D print approach, the entire assembly, parts and prototypes are built using various plastic and metal materials directly from the software file input, completely bypassing any additional processing steps. The review highlights their potential place in the overall process flow to reduce the complexity of traditional microfabrication and long processing cycles needed to test multiple prototypes before the final design is set. Findings - Additive manufacturing (AM) is a promising manufacturing technique in micro-device technology. Practical implications - In the current state of 3D printing, microfluidic and lab-on-a-chip devices for fluid handling and manipulation appear to be the most compatible with the 3D print methods, given their fairly coarse minimum feature size of 50-500 mu m. Future directions in the 3D materials and method development are identified, such as adhesion and material compatibility studies of the 3D print materials, wafer-level printing and conductive materials development. One of the most important goals should be the drive toward finer resolution and layer thickness (1-10 mu m) to stimulate the use of the 3D printing in a wider array of MEMS devices. Originality/value - The review combines two discrete disciplines, microfabrication and AM, and shows how microfabrication and micro-device commercialization may benefit from employing methods developed by the AM community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available