4.4 Article

C-13 and O-18 fractionation effects on open splits and on the ion source in continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry

Journal

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 1419-1430

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.4531

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurements of carbon and oxygen isotopes of CO2 by continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry are widely used in environmental studies and climate change research. Yet, there are remaining problems associated with the reproducibility of measurements, in particular when high precision is required and/or the amount of sample material is limited. Isotopic fractionations in open splits and nonlinear effects occurring in the mass spectrometer due to different sample amounts alter the results. In this study, we discuss the influence and the origin of these two effects and propose procedures for preventing their impact. Fractionation in the open split can be related to diffusion of CO2 and can lead to shifted delta-values when measuring a sample gas against a reference gas injected via different open splits. We present a method, where such fractionations can be minimized by adjusting either the position of the capillaries or the flow rates involved or both. The nonlinear peak area dependence of delta C-13 measurements for small sample sizes can be explained by adsorption/desorption processes in the ionization chamber or its vicinity. For constant amplitudes, the magnitude of the nonlinearity only depends on the amount of CO2 entering the ion source. This nonlinearity can be eliminated by a small additional flux of a conditioning gas fed to the mass spectrometer. The best results were obtained when using carbon monoxide. For the adsorption process in the mass spectrometer we found a fractionation factor of 0.982 +/- 0.005 for delta C-13 and 1.002 +/- 0.004 for delta O-18. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available