4.4 Article

Cysteine-reactive covalent capture tags for enrichment of cysteine-containing peptides

Journal

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
Volume 23, Issue 21, Pages 3377-3386

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.4261

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [3152A0-108184/1]
  2. Ernst & Lucie Schmidheiny Foundation
  3. Societe Academique of Geneva
  4. Faculty of Medicine of the University of Geneva

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Considering the tremendous complexity and the wide dynamic range of protein samples from biological origin and their proteolytic peptide mixtures, proteomics largely requires simplification strategies. One common approach to reduce sample complexity is to target a particular amino acid in proteins or peptides, such as cysteine (Cys), with chemical tags in order to reduce the analysis to a subset of the whole proteome. The present work describes the synthesis and the use of two new cysteinyl tags, so-called cysteine-reactive covalent capture tags ((CT)-T-3), for the isolation of Cys-containing peptides. These bifunctional molecules were specifically designed to react with cysteines through iodoacetyl and acryloyl moieties and permit efficient selection of the tagged peptides. To do so, a thioproline was chosen as the isolating group to form, after a deprotection/activation step, a thiazolidine with an aldehyde resin by the covalent capture (CC) method. The applicability of the enrichment strategy was demonstrated on small synthetic peptides as well as on peptides derived from digested proteins. Mass spectrometric (MS) analysis and tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) sequencing confirmed the efficient and straightforward selection of the cysteine-containing peptides. The combination of (CT)-T-3 and CC methods provides an effective alternative to reduce sample complexity and access low abundance proteins. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available