4.2 Article

Resistance to Invasion and Resilience to Fire in Desert Shrublands of North America

Journal

RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT
Volume 64, Issue 5, Pages 431-438

Publisher

SOC RANGE MANAGEMENT
DOI: 10.2111/REM-D-09-00165.1

Keywords

Chihuahuan Desert; ecological resilience; ecological resistance; Great Basin Desert; Mojave Desert; Sonoran Desert

Funding

  1. US Geological Survey
  2. US Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station
  3. Joint Fire Science Program [00-1-2-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Settlement by Anglo-Americans in the desert shrublands of North America resulted in the introduction and subsequent invasion of multiple nonnative grass species. These invasions have altered presettlement fire regimes, resulted in conversion of native perennial shrublands to nonnative annual grasslands, and placed many native desert species at risk. Effective management of these ecosystems requires an understanding of their ecological resistance to invasion and resilience to fire. Resistance and resilience differ among the cold and hot desert shrublands of the Great Basin, Mojave, Sonoran, and Chihuahuan deserts in North America. These differences are largely determined by spatial and temporal patterns of productivity but also are affected by ecological memory, severity and frequency of disturbance, and feedbacks among invasive species and disturbance regimes. Strategies for preventing or managing invasive plant/fire regimes cycles in desert shrublands include: 1) conducting periodic resource assessments to evaluate the probability of establishment of an altered fire regime; 2) developing an understanding of ecological thresholds associate within invasion resistance and fire resilience that characterize transitions from desirable to undesirable fire regimes; and 3) prioritizing management activities based on resistance of areas to invasion and resilience to fire.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available