4.7 Review

Is there a role for proton therapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma? A systematic review

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages 1-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.02.001

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Proton therapy; Systematic review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper aimed to review the literature concerning the use of proton therapy systematically in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, focusing on clinical results and technical issues. The literature search was conducted according to a specific protocol in the Medline and Scopus databases by two independent researchers covering the period of 1990-2012. Both clinical and technical studies referring to a population of patients actually treated with protons were included. The PRISMA guidelines for reporting systematic reviews were followed. A final set of 16 studies from seven proton therapy institutions worldwide were selected from an initial dataset of 324 reports. Seven clinical studies, five reports on technical issues, three studies on treatment related toxicity and one paper reporting both clinical results and toxicity analysis were retrieved. Four studies were not published as full papers. Passive scattering was the most adopted delivery technique. More than 900 patients with heterogeneous stages of disease were treated with various fractionation schedules. Only one prospective full paper was found. Local control was approximately 80% at 3-5 years, average overall survival at 5 years was 32%, with data comparable to surgery in the most favorable groups. Toxicity was low (mainly gastrointestinal). Normal liver V0(Gy) < 30%(volume) and V30(Gy) < 18-25%(volume) were suggested as cut-off values for hepatic toxicity. The good clinical results of the selected papers are counterbalanced by a low level of evidence. However, the rationale to enroll patients in prospective studies appears to be strong. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. Radiotherapy and Oncology 111 (2014) 1-10 This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available