4.7 Article

Gold nanoparticle cellular uptake, toxicity and radiosensitisation in hypoxic conditions

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 110, Issue 2, Pages 342-347

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.12.013

Keywords

Gold nanoparticles; Radiosensitisers; Toxicity; Hypoxia

Funding

  1. Men Against Cancer
  2. Cancer Research UK [C1278/A990, C1513/A7047]
  3. EPSRC [EP/K039342/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [G0502183] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. STFC [ST/K001957/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K039342/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0502183] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K001957/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purpose: Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are novel agents that have been shown to cause radiosensitisation in vitro and in vivo. Tumour hypoxia is associated with radiation resistance and reduced survival in cancer patients. The interaction of GNPs with cells in hypoxia is explored. Materials and methods: GNP uptake, localization, toxicity and radiosensitisation were assessed in vitro under oxic and hypoxic conditions. Results: GNP cellular uptake was significantly lower under hypoxic than oxic conditions. A significant reduction in cell proliferation in hypoxic MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells exposed to GNPs was observed. In these cells significant radiosensitisation occurred in normoxia and moderate hypoxia. However, in near anoxia no significant sensitisation occurred. Conclusions: GNP uptake occurred in hypoxic conditions, causing radiosensitisation in moderate, but not extreme hypoxia in a breast cancer cell line. These findings may be important for the development of GNPs for cancer therapy. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available