4.7 Review

Radiographic changes after lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) - Can we distinguish recurrence from fibrosis? A systematic review of the literature

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages 335-342

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.018

Keywords

Stereotactic radiation; Lung cancer; Computed tomography; Positron emission tomography; Local recurrence

Funding

  1. Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
  2. Ontario Institute for Cancer Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Changes in lung density on computed tomography (CT) are common after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and can confound the early detection of recurrence. We performed a systematic review to describe post-SABR findings on computed tomography (CT) and positron-emission tomography (PET), identify imaging characteristics that predict recurrence and propose a follow-up imaging algorithm. Methods: A systematic review was conducted of studies providing detailed radiologic descriptions of anatomic and metabolic lung changes after SABR. Our search returned 824 studies; 26 met our inclusion criteria. Data are presented according to PRISMA guidelines. Results: Acute changes post-SABR predominantly appear as consolidation or ground glass opacities. Late changes often demonstrate a modified conventional pattern of fibrosis, evolving beyond 2 years after treatment. Several CT features, including an enlarging opacity, correlate with recurrence. Although PET SUVmax may rise immediately post-SABR, an SUVmax >= 5 carries a high predictive value of recurrence. Conclusions: CT density changes are common post-SABR. The available evidence suggests that recurrent disease should be suspected if high-risk CT changes are seen with SUVmax >= 5 on PET. Further studies are needed to validate the predictive values of such metrics, and for advanced analysis of CT changes to allow early detection of potentially curable local recurrence. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 102 (2012) 335-342

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available