4.7 Article

Ex vivo digestion of carp muscle tissue - ACE inhibitory and antioxidant activities of the obtained hydrolysates

Journal

FOOD & FUNCTION
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 211-218

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4fo00621f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Centre in Poland [N N312 465240]
  2. University of Warmia and Mazury [528-0712-0882, 528-0712-0809]
  3. EEA Financial Mechanism
  4. Norwegian Financial Mechanism
  5. European Union within the European Social Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the digestive tract of humans, bioactive peptides, i.e. protein fragments impacting the physiological activity of the body, may be released during the digestion of food proteins, including those of fish. The aim of the study was to establish the method of human ex vivo digestion of carp muscle tissue and evaluate the angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory and antioxidant activities of hydrolysates obtained after digestion. It was found that the hydrolysates of carp muscle tissue obtained with the three-stage method of simulated ex vivo digestion showed ACE inhibitory as well as antioxidative activities. It was demonstrated that the degree of hydrolysis depended on the duration of individual stages and the degree of comminution of the examined material. Although the applied gastric juices initiated the process of hydrolysis of carp muscle tissue, the duodenal juices caused a rapid increase in the amount of hydrolysed polypeptide bonds. The antihypertensive and antioxidative activities of the hydrolysates of carp muscle tissue increased together with progressive protein degradation. However, the high degree of protein hydrolysis does not favour an increase in the activity of free radical scavenging. The presented results are an example of the first preliminary screening of the potential health-promoting biological activity of carp muscle tissue in an ex vivo study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available