4.7 Article

3D CT-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Clinical impact on late rectal bleeding and local control

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages 507-513

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.10.002

Keywords

Cervical cancer; Late rectal bleeding; Radiotherapy; CT-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Funding

  1. National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea [0910240]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purpose: To identify the impact of 3D CT-based high-dose-rate intracavitary radiotherapy (ICR) on late rectal bleeding (LRB) and local control (LC) in patients with cervical cancer. Material and methods: The outcomes of 97 consecutive patients treated with 3D CT-based ICR (3D-ICR) were compared with those of 133 consecutive historical patients with conventional 2D brachytherapy planning (2D-ICR). The median follow-up periods were 41 and 56 months for the 3D and 2D groups. respectively. Results: The overall rectal bleeding rate was similar between the groups (42% for 3D-ICR vs. 44% for 2D-ICR); however, the incidence of severe LRB was higher in the 20-ICR group than in the 3D-ICR group (13% vs. 2%, respectively; p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, the factors associated with severe LRB were tumor >4 cm (12% vs. 3%) and 2D-ICR (10% vs. 2%). The LC rates were 97% and 91% for 3D-ICR and 2D-ICR, respectively (p = 0.14): the progression-free survival rate was 80% for both groups. A significant difference in the LC rates between the two groups was observed in patients with larger tumor sizes with the tumor diameter of over 4 cm (98% vs. 81% by 3D-ICR vs. 2D-ICR, respectively; p = 0.02). Conclusions: The implementation of 3D-ICR in radiotherapy for cervical cancer can reduce the incidence of severe LRB and may improve the LC rate. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 97 (2010) 507-513

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available