Journal
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages 388-397Publisher
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.04.017
Keywords
gamma H2AX; Hypersensitivity; Apoptosis; Epidermis; Normal tissue; Parp-1; DNA damage; DNA repair; Double strand breaks; DSB; Digital image analysis; Foci
Funding
- Swedish Cancer Society [1109-B06-22XBB]
- Department of Oncology at the University of Uppsala
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background and purpose: A low-dose hypersensitivity to radiation can be observed in vitro for many human cell types in terms of increased cell kill per dose unit for doses below 0.5 Gy. Quantification of the double-strand break marker gamma H2AX in samples taken in clinical radiotherapy practice has the potential to provide important information about how induction and repair of severe DNA damage and apoptosis are linked to low-dose hypersensitivity. Material and methods: The effects of exposure to low doses (0.05-1.1 Gy) were investigated in skin biopsies taken from prostate cancer patients undergoing the first week of radiotherapy. gamma H2AX foci and apoptotic cells were visualised by immunohistochemistry and quantified by image analysis. Results: The gamma H2AX foci pattern in biopsies taken 30 min after a single fraction revealed a low-dose hypersensitivity below 0.3 Gy (p = 0.0009). The result was consistent for repeated fractions (p = 0.00001). No decrease in foci numbers could be detected when comparing biopsies taken 30 min and 2 h after single fractions of 0.4 and 1.2 Gy. The result was consistent for repeated fractions. Only 43 of 168,000 cells in total were identified as apoptotic, yet a dose dependency could be detected after I week of radiotherapy (p = 0.003). Conclusions: We describe a method based on gamma H2AX to study DNA damage response and apoptosis in a clinical setting. A gamma H2AX hypersensitive response to low doses can be observed in epidermal skin, already 30 min following delivered fraction. A very low frequency of apoptosis in normal epithelium suggests that this effect is not an important part of the in vivo response to low doses. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 88 (2008) 388-397.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available