4.7 Article

Advantages of US in Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy: Randomized Controlled Trial and Review of the Literature

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 273, Issue 3, Pages 927-936

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140088

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To compare procedure times and complication rates of preincisional ultrasonographic (US) evaluation and perioperative US guidance in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) with those of the current standard of care, PDT performed without image guidance. Materials and Methods: Between December 2007 and January 2011, 341 patients were included in this institutional review board-approved study after informed consent was obtained from the patients or their relatives. The patients were divided randomly into two groups. In group A (n = 166), the possible causes of complications, such as aberrations of tracheal, thyroidal, and vascular structures, were determined with US, and tracheal measurements were performed by using US. The clinician's initial considerations at physical examination were compared with the US findings. PDT was subsequently performed with US guidance in suitable cases. In group B (n = 175), PDT was performed solely on the basis of physical landmarks. The procedure times and complication rates were compared across groups by using the Fisher exact test. Results: In group A, the puncture sites designated at the physical examination were reconsidered in 39 (23.8%) of 164 cases. The perioperative complication rates were slightly lower in group A (7.8% [12 of 154]) than in group B (15.0% [25 of 167]); however, the difference did not achieve statistical significance (P = .054). The mean procedure times for groups A and B were 24.09 minutes +/- 8.05 (standard deviation) (range, 14-68 minutes) and 18.62 minutes +/- 6.34 (range, 12-81 minutes), respectively (P = .001), and the numbers of patients in each group who required multiple puncture attempts were six (3.9%) of 154 and 23 (13.6%) of 169 (P = .003), respectively. Conclusion: The use of US guidance before and during PDT could render the procedure easier and safer, with fewer complications but a slightly longer procedure time. (C) RSNA, 2014

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available