4.7 Article

Validation of Quantitative Analysis of Multiparametric Prostate MR Images for Prostate Cancer Detection and Aggressiveness Assessment: A Cross-Imager Study

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 271, Issue 2, Pages 461-471

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131320

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command Prostate Cancer Research Program through an Idea Development Award [PC093485]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To validate three previously identified quantitative image features across multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) images acquired with imagers made by two different manufacturers to differentiate prostate cancer (PC) from normal prostatic tissue and to assess cancer aggressiveness. Materials and Methods: This study was HIPAA-compliant and approved by the institutional review board. Preoperative 1.5-T multiparametric endorectal MR images of 119 PC patients (dataset A, 71 patients; dataset B, 48 patients) were analyzed, and 265 PC and normal peripheral zone regions of interests (ROIs) were identified through histologic and MR consensus review. The 10th percentile average apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, average ADC value, and skewness of T2-weighted signal-intensity histogram were evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The image features were combined with a linear discriminant analysis classifier and evaluated both on the image dataset of each type of imager alone (leave-one-patient-out evaluation) and across the datasets (training on one dataset, testing on the other). Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated between the image features and ROI-specific Gleason scores. Results: AUC values of the image features combined were 0.95 +/- 0.02 (standard error) and 0.88 +/- 0.03 on dataset B and dataset A alone, respectively, and 0.96 +/- 0.02 and 0.89 +/- 0.03 when training on dataset A and testing on dataset B and vice versa, respectively. Spearman correlation coefficients between Gleason scores and the ADC features were between 20.27 and 20.34. Conclusion: Consistently across images from datasets A and B, the 10th percentile ADC value, average ADC value, and T2-weighted skewness can distinguish PC from normal-tissue ROIs, and ADC features correlate moderately with ROI-specific Gleason scores. (C) RSNA, 2014

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available