Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols
D. R. Dance et al.
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY (2011)
Breast tomosynthesis in clinical practice: initial results
Hendrik J. Teertstra et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2010)
Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study
Gisella Gennaro et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2010)
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Observer Performance Study
David Gur et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2009)
Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis
Stephen L. Hillis et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2008)
Digital breast tomosynthesis: A pilot observer study
Walter F. Good et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2008)
Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings
Ingvar Andersson et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2008)
The Laboratory effect: Comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations
David Gur et al.
RADIOLOGY (2008)
Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: Comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts
Marco Rosselli Del Turco et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2007)
Physical characterization of a scanning photon counting digital mammography system based on Si-strip detectors
Magnus Aslund et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2007)
Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast
Ioannis Sechopoulos et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2007)
Digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography
Steven P. Poplack et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2007)
Scatter rejection in multislit digital mammography
M Åslund et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2006)
A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging
X Gong et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2006)
AEC for scanning digital mammography based on variation of scan velocity
M Åslund et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2005)
Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening
ED Pisano et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2005)
Memory effect in observer performance studies of mammograms
LA Hardesty et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2005)
Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: Randomized trial in a population-based screening program - The Oslo II study
P Skaane et al.
RADIOLOGY (2004)
Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom
R Smith-Bindman et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2003)
Population-based mammography screening: Comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading - Oslo I study
P Skaane et al.
RADIOLOGY (2003)
Data analysis for detection and localization of multiple abnormalities with application to mammography
NA Obuchowski et al.
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY (2000)
An investigation into why two-view mammography is better than one-view in breast cancer screening
AK Hackshaw et al.
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY (2000)
Share Paper
