4.7 Article

Rising Use of CT in Child Visits to the Emergency Department in the United States, 1995-2008

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 259, Issue 3, Pages 793-801

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101939

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Toshiba Medical Systems for Toshiba Aquilion Dosimetry Study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To describe nationwide trends and factors associated with the use of computed tomography (CT) in children visiting emergency departments (EDs) in the United States between 1995 and 2008. Materials and Methods: This study was exempt from institutional review board oversight. Data from the 1995-2008 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey were used to evaluate the number and percentage of visits associated with CT for patients younger than 18 years. A mean of 7375 visits were sampled each year. Data were subcategorized according to multiple patient and hospital characteristics. The Rao-Scott x 2 test was performed to determine whether CT use was similar across subpopulations. Results: From 1995 to 2008, the number of pediatric ED visits that included CT examination increased from 0.33 to 1.65 million, a fivefold increase, with a compound annual growth rate of 13.2%. The percentage of visits associated with CT increased from 1.2% to 5.9%, a 4.8-fold increase, with a compound annual growth rate of 12.8%. The number of visits associated with CT at pediatric-focused and non-pediatric-focused EDs increased from 14 895 and 316 133, respectively, in 1995 to 212 716 and 1 438 413, respectively, in 2008. By the end of the study period, top chief complaints among those undergoing CT included head injury, abdominal pain, and headache. Conclusion: Use of CT in children who visit the ED has increased substantially and occurs primarily at non-pediatric-focused facilities. This underscores the need for special attention to this vulnerable population to ensure that imaging is appropriately ordered, performed, and interpreted. (C) RSNA, 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available