4.6 Article

Prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with chest pain of suspected cardiac origin

Journal

RADIOLOGIA MEDICA
Volume 116, Issue 5, Pages 690-705

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-011-0647-z

Keywords

Computed tomography coronary angiography; Prognostic value; Prognosis; Acute chest pain

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors sought to determine the prognostic value of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with acute chest pain (ACP). A total of 145 consecutive patients (75 men; 64 +/- 12 years) with ACP were referred from the Emergency Department for CTCA, which was performed with a standard protocol using a 64-slice scanner. Patients were stratified according to the Morise clinical score (low, intermediate, high) and to the CTCA findings [absence of coronary artery disease (CAD), nonobstructive CAD, obstructive CAD]. Patients were followed up for the occurrence of major events: cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina and revascularisation. One hundred and twenty-seven (87.6%) patients were without a history of CAD, and 18 (12.4%) patients had a history of CAD. Obstructive CAD (> 50% luminal narrowing) was detected in 35 (24%) patients; nonobstructive CAD (a parts per thousand currency sign50% luminal narrowing) in 62 (43%) and absence of CAD in 48 (33%) patients. During a mean follow-up of 20 +/- 3 months, 20 events occurred (four hard events). Sixteen events (three hard events) occurred in patients without a history of CAD, and four events (one hard event) occurred in patients with a history of CAD. In patients with absence of CAD as detected by CTCA, the rate of events was 0%. At multivariate analysis, hypercholesterolaemia and obstructive CAD were significant predictors of events (p < 0.05). An excellent prognosis was observed in patients with ACP and normal CTCA. CTCA shows the potential for optimal stratification of patients with ACP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available