Journal
RADIOCARBON
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 337-360Publisher
UNIV ARIZONA DEPT GEOSCIENCES
DOI: 10.1017/S0033822200033865
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Historic Environment Enabling Programme [3164]
- Natural Environment Research Council
Ask authors/readers for more resources
If radiocarbon measurements are to be used at all for chronological purposes, we have to use statistical methods for calibration. The most widely used method of calibration can be seen as a simple application of Bayesian statistics, which uses both the information from the new measurement and information from the WC calibration curve. In most dating applications, however, we have larger numbers of (14)C measurements and we wish to relate those to events in the past. Bayesian statistics provides a coherent framework in which such analysis can be performed and is becoming a core element in many (14)C dating projects. This article gives an overview of the main model components used in chronological analysis, their mathematical formulation, and examples of how such analyses can be performed using the latest version of the OxCal software (v4). Many such models can be put together, in a modular fashion, from simple elements, with defined constraints and groupings. In other cases, the commonly used uniform phase models might not be appropriate, and ramped, exponential, or normal distributions of events might be more useful. When considering analyses of these kinds, it is useful to be able run simulations on synthetic data. Methods for performing such tests are discussed here along with other methods of diagnosing possible problems with statistical models of this kind.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available