4.4 Article

Accuracy of GPS total electron content: GPS receiver bias temperature dependence

Journal

RADIO SCIENCE
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 190-196

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/rds.20011

Keywords

GPS TEC; low-frequency arrays; receiver bias

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [ATM-0753840, AGS-1023098]
  2. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [1242204, 1023098] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Having an accurate method to estimate and remove ionospheric effects is a major issue for low-frequency radio astronomy arrays, as the ionosphere is one of their largest error terms. One way to estimate the ionosphere is to measure total electron content (TEC) using dual frequency global positioning system (GPS) signals. This technique uses the dispersive nature of the ionosphere, as both group and phase velocities are (to first order) dependent on the inverse square of the frequency and on TEC. Using these properties, TEC can be measured to a high degree of accuracy by computing the delay difference between signals at GPS's two frequencies (L1=1575.42 and L2=1227.6MHz). Unfortunately, effects other than ionospheric dispersion also introduce differential delay differences. These additional differences, called biases, can be separated into those introduced by the satellite and those by the receiver. Receiver biases show the most significant variations, sometimes over intervals of hours. Changing temperature conditions at the receiver antenna, along the cable, or in the internal receiver hardware are thought to be responsible for some of these variations. We report here on an investigation of the temperature dependence of the GPS receiver bias. Our results show that for our particular receiver, antenna, and cable set-up, a temperature-dependent bias is clearly evident, and that this temperature dependence varies from receiver to receiver. When the receiver bias temperature dependence is removed, a noise level of 13 TEC units still remains in the bias estimation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available