4.2 Article

Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures

Journal

RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY
Volume 131, Issue 4, Pages 531-534

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncn244

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19591398]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

At present, interventional radiology (IVR) tends to involve long procedures (long radiation duration), and physicians are near to the source of scattered radiation. Hence, shielding is critical in protecting physicians from radiation. Protective aprons and additional lead-shielding devices, such as tableside lead drapes, are important means of protecting the physician from scattered radiation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether non-lead aprons are effective in protecting physicians from radiation during IVR procedures. In this study, the radiation protection effects of commercially available protective lead and non-lead aprons, when exposed to diagnostic X rays, are compared. The performance of these non-lead and lead aprons was similar for scattered X rays at tube voltages of 60-120 kV. Properly designed non-lead aprons are thus more suitable for physicians because they weigh similar to 20% less than the lead aprons, and are non-toxic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available