4.6 Article

Natural radioactivity and radiological hazards of building materials in Xianyang, China

Journal

RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 81, Issue 7, Pages 780-784

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.02.043

Keywords

Radioactivity; Building materials; Gamma ray spectrometry; Hazard index

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [GK200901008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Common building materials collected from Xianyang, China were analyzed for the natural radioactivity of Ra-226, Th-232 and K-40 using gamma-ray spectroscopy. The average activity concentration of Ra-226, Th-232 and K-40 in the studied building materials ranges from 13.4 to 69.9, 13.1-99.1 and 124.7-915.1 Bq kg(-1), respectively. The measured activity concentrations for these radionuclides were compared with the reported data of other countries and with the worldwide average activity of soil. To assess the radiation hazard of the natural radioactivity in all samples to the people, the radium equivalent activity, external hazard index, internal hazard index, indoor absorbed dose rate and total annual effective dose were estimated. The radium equivalent activities of the studied samples are below the internationally accepted values. The external hazard index and internal hazard index of all analyzed building materials are less than unity. The mean values of indoor absorbed dose rate for all building materials except for lime are higher than the world population-weighted average of 84 nGy h(-1) and the total annual effective dose values of building materials are lower than 1 mSv y(-1) except for some cyan brick samples. The study shows the measured building materials do not pose significant source of radiation hazard and are safe for use in the construction of dwellings. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available