4.5 Article

Effects of propranolol in combination with radiation on apoptosis and survival of gastric cancer cells in vitro

Journal

RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-5-98

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend radiotherapy as a standard treatment for patients with a high risk of recurrence in gastric cancer. Because gastric cancer demonstrates limited sensitivity to radiotherapy, a radiosensitizer might therefore be useful to enhance the radiosensitivity of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. In this study, we evaluated if propranolol, a beta-adrenoceptor (beta-AR) antagonist, could enhance radiosensitivity and explored its precise molecular mechanism in gastric cancer cells. Methods: Human gastric adenocarcinoma cell lines (SGC-7901 and BGC-823) were treated with or without propranolol and exposed to radiation. Cell viability and clonogenic survival assays were performed, and cell apoptosis was evaluated with flow cytometry. In addition, the expression of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were detected by western blot and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results: Propranolol combined with radiation decreased cell viability and clonogenic survivability. Furthermore, it also induced apoptosis in both cell lines tested, as determined by Annexin V staining. In addition, treatment with propranolol decreased the level of NF-kappa B and, subsequently, down-regulated VEGF, COX-2, and EGFR expression. Conclusions: Taken together, these results suggested that propranolol enhanced the sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to radiation through the inhibition of beta-ARs and the downstream NF-kappa B-VEGF/EGFR/COX-2 pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available