4.7 Article

Twin-like defects in L10 ordered τ-MnAl-C studied by EBSD

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages 48-54

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.044

Keywords

Electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD); Grain boundary structure; Hard magnetic material; Rare earth free; Coercivity

Funding

  1. FP7 EU project ROMEO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Twin-like defects in tau-MnAl-C, which has the L1(0) structure, have been studied using electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) in as-transformed and in subsequently hot extruded samples. In both states, three distinct twin-like defects were found, whose misorientations were described by rotations of 62 degrees, 118 degrees and 180 degrees about the normal to {111}. These are denoted as pseudo twins, order twins and true twins, respectively. The true twins are often observed in this type of material. The order twins formed the boundaries between regions where the c-axes were almost perpendicular to each other and these were thought to form due to the accumulation of strains during the transformation to tau from the hexagonal parent phase, epsilon. Due to symmetry, pseudo twins necessarily appeared at points where order twins interacted with true twins. The frequency of the different defects was very sensitive to the sample state. As the parent phase epsilon is not involved in the dynamic recrystallization which occurred during hot extrusion, there was a greatly reduced fraction of order twins and pseudo twins in the hot extruded state. The misorientation angle of the magnetically easy < 001 > axis across the three twin-like defects was 48 degrees, 86 degrees and 75 degrees for pseudo, order and true twins, respectively. The interaction of the three twin-like defects with 180 degrees magnetic domain walls and the resulting effect on the magnetic properties of the material may therefore be different. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available