4.7 Article

An 8700 year paleoclimate reconstruction from the southern Maya lowlands

Journal

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages 19-25

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.08.004

Keywords

Paleoclimate; Holocene; Maya lowlands; Oxygen isotopes; Pollen; Zea

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (DDIG) [0327305]
  2. Foundation for Anthropological Research and Environmental Studies (FARES)
  3. Mirador Basin/Cuenca Mirador project
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0327305] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [0327305] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analysis of a sediment core from Lago Puerto Arturo, a closed basin lake in northern Peten, Guatemala, has provided an similar to 8700 cal year record of climate change and human activity in the southern Maya lowlands. Stable isotope, magnetic susceptibility, and pollen analyses were used to reconstruct environmental change in the region. Results indicate a relatively wet early to middle Holocene followed by a drier late Holocene, which we interpret as reflecting long-term changes in insolation (precession). Higher frequency variability is more likely attributable to changes in ocean/atmosphere circulation in both the North Atlantic and the Pacific Oceans. Pollen and isotope data show that most of the period of prehispanic agricultural settlement, i.e. similar to 5000-1000 cal yr BP, was characterized by drier conditions than previous or subsequent periods. The presence of Zea (corn) pollen through peak aridity during the Terminal Classic period (similar to 1250-1130 cal yr BP) suggests that drought may not have had as negative an impact as previously proposed. A dramatic negative shift in isotope values indicates an increase in precipitation after similar to 950 cal yr BP (hereafter BP). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available