4.7 Article

Late Quaternary vegetation history of North Stradbroke Island, Queensland, eastern Australia

Journal

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages 257-272

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.02.019

Keywords

Late Quaternary climate dynamics; Subtropical Queensland; Last Glacial Maximum; Australia; Pollen; Charcoal; Lake sediments

Funding

  1. ARC [LP0990124]
  2. AINSE [AINGRA07115, AINGRA10067]
  3. School of Geography Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland
  4. University of Queensland (UQ Research Development Grant)
  5. University of Queensland (UQ New Staff Start-Up Grant)
  6. Australian Research Council [LP0990124] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently there is a paucity of records of late Quaternary palaeoenvironmental variability available from the subtropics of Australia. The three continuous palaeoecological records presented here, from North Stradbroke Island, subtropical Queensland, assist in bridging this large spatial gap in the current state of knowledge. The dominance of arboreal taxa in the pollen records throughout the past >40,000 years is in contrast with the majority of records from temperate Australia, and indicates a positive moisture balance for North Stradbroke Island. The charcoal records show considerable inter-site variability indicating the importance of local-scale events on individual records, and highlighting the caution that needs to be applied when interpreting a single site as a regional record. The variability in the burning regimes is interpreted as being influenced by both climatic and human factors. Despite this inter-site variability, broad environmental trends are identifiable, with changes in the three records comparable with the OZ-INTIMATE climate synthesis for the last 35,000 years. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available