4.7 Article

Quantitative estimation of Holocene surface salinity variation in the Black Sea using dinoflagellate cyst process length

Journal

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 39, Issue -, Pages 45-59

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.01.026

Keywords

Paleosalinity; Lingulodinium machaerophorum; rDNA analysis; Caspian Sea; Sea of Azov; Black Sea; Marmara Sea

Funding

  1. JSPS
  2. Institute for the Encouragement of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT)
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. Leverhulme Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reconstruction of salinity in the Holocene Black Sea has been an ongoing debate over the past four decades. Here we calibrate summer surface water salinity in the Black Sea, Sea of Azov and Caspian Sea with the process length of the dinoflagellate cyst Lingulodinium machaerophorum. We then apply this calibration to make a regional reconstruction of paleosalinity in the Black Sea, calculated by averaging out process length variation observed at four core sites from the Black Sea with high sedimentation rates and dated by multiple mollusk shell ages. Results show a very gradual change of salinity from similar to 14 +/- 0.91 psu around 9.9 cal ka BP to a minimum similar to 12.3 +/- 0.91 psu around 8.5 cal ka BP, reaching current salinities of similar to 17.1 +/- 0.91 psu around 4.1 cal ka BP. The resolution of our sampling is about 250 years, and it fails to reveal a catastrophic salinization event at similar to 9.14 cal ka BP advocated by other researchers. The dinoflagellate cyst salinity-proxy does not record large Holocene salinity fluctuations, and after early Holocene freshening, it shows correspondence to the regional sea-level curve of Bruckner et al. (2010) derived from Balabanov (2007). (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available