4.7 Article

Last Glacial Maximum climate in New Zealand inferred from a modelled Southern Alps icefield

Journal

QUATERNARY SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 30-45

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2012.05.004

Keywords

Ice-sheet modelling; Palaeoclimate; Glaciology; Glacial geology

Funding

  1. VUW Foundation grant ARCMORG, a University of Canterbury Bluefern HPC 'Grand Challenge' award
  2. Corner Science and Education Foundation
  3. Division Of Earth Sciences
  4. Directorate For Geosciences [0823521] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [0745781] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a simulation of the New Zealand Southern Alps icefield at the last Glacial Maximum (LGM, c. 30,000-20,000 calendar years ago (ka)) in an attempt to constrain the climate of that period. We use a 500 m-resolution ice-sheet model parameterised using empirical glaciological, climatological and geological data specific to the model domain to simulate the entire Southern Alps icefield. We find that an LGM cooling of at least 6-6.5 degrees C is necessary to bring about valley glaciers that extend beyond the mountains. However, climate-topography thresholds related to the elevation and hypsometry of individual catchments control the gradient of the rate of glacier expansion in the domain, and in order to remain within geologically reconstructed LGM limits we find that the LGM cooling was most likely associated with a precipitation regime up to 25% drier than today. Wetter-than-present scenarios give rise to equilibrium line depressions and ice extents that are incompatible with empirical evidence. These results perhaps indicate that either the westerly air masses affecting New Zealand during the LGM were drier than today, or that they were weaker or zonally displaced with respect to present. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available